"Progress is our most important product."
In the late 50's and early 60's, that
slogan helped General Electric and its spokesman Ronald Reagan to sell countless
washing machines, refrigerators, and light bulbs.
GE was on to something here, maybe more than it realized. Its slogan embodied a deep-seated Western idea: that "progress" is an autonomous propellant rocketing us through time toward a brighter (no pun intended) future. This idea is firmly anchored in the conviction that history represents the unfolding of a divine plan, or the working out of natural laws toward specific ends. That can be an ethereal heaven, an earthly utopia, or both, depending on one's personal proclivities. Every day in every way, things will get better and better, so long as we act according to divine precepts or, in the secular version of things, natural laws. At least we hope(d) so.
But dial back about 10,000 years to history's most influential illustration of progress: the food-producing revolution, when humans switched from hunting and gathering their food to producing it. Any textbook on World History or Western Civilization will (and should) proclaim in celebratory detail what this revolution made possible: food surpluses that supported all sorts of specialists--entrepreneurs, scientists, engineers, mathematicians, healers, writers, priests, politicians, soldiers, artists, poets, philosophers, and musicians, and so forth.

Huzzah!
But here's where things get
interesting. Food production also entailed radical environmental changes
and enormous collateral damage. Like any revolution, say 1789 France,
food production created its own version of The Terror. It brought a
poorer diet (from high-calorie/low nutrient foods) and chronic arthritis (from
prepping fields). It concentrated excrement where people lived.
Rodents infested food storage sites. Waste from animals, relatives,
friends, enemies, and neighbors permeated homes, streets, agricultural areas,
and water supplies. It made possible our most highly contagious, terrifying
diseases: domesticated animals transmitted smallpox, influenza, measles,
tuberculosis and whooping cough. It brought epidemics and massive
die-offs to densely-populated communities with already compromised immune
systems. It brought trade, communication, warfare, empire building, and
exploration, all of which exacerbated the damage.
And the Party flourished while
Athenians democratized, Mozarts composed, da Vincis painted, Michangelos
sculpted, Newtons and Einsteins calculated, and Kochs, Pasteurs and Flemings
experimented (producing, by the way, even more massive environmental changes
than the agricultural revolution).
In contrast, the Pathogen
Party by-passed nomadic hunter-gatherers with their
"poop-and-go" lifestyle. They lived in smaller communities, had
no domestic animals, ate a healthier diet, didn't suffer from arthritis, and
had lots more leisure time than their "civilized"
counterparts. No wonder Jared Diamond published a 1987 essay on the
food-producing revolution with this in-your-face title: "The Worst
Mistake in the History of the Human Race."
In short, disease was the "inconvenient truth" of the revolution that gave us civilization. Great progress meant great trouble, yet I doubt we'd give up the former to avoid the latter. In fact, it's civilization itself that provides the tools to even entertain such a notion. Indeed, the food-producing revolution shows that humans adapt--often involuntarily and painfully, sometimes with foresight and ingenuity, sometimes with courage or cowardice, sometimes with all the above.
![]() |
San Hunter-Gatherers, Southern Africa |
In short, disease was the "inconvenient truth" of the revolution that gave us civilization. Great progress meant great trouble, yet I doubt we'd give up the former to avoid the latter. In fact, it's civilization itself that provides the tools to even entertain such a notion. Indeed, the food-producing revolution shows that humans adapt--often involuntarily and painfully, sometimes with foresight and ingenuity, sometimes with courage or cowardice, sometimes with all the above.
Progress may well be our most
important product, and pursuit of its benefits seems entrenched in our
intellectual DNA. But when viewed through history's wider lens,
"Progress" as our most important product looks pretty spooky. Its
creative and destructive elements are inseparable and interdependent. Welcome to one of history's profound ironies.
Very good comments, Bry!!! I never thought about the numerous consequences of the food production revolution. History is so much more alive and interesting when the various aspects of it are brought together and shown to be interrelated as you've shown in this article.
ReplyDeleteMany thanks for your comment, Corinne. There are so many "rabbit holes" one can fall into when pursuing this or that topic…and as you noted, discovering the connections among them is what gives history some spice!
DeleteA wonderful thought piece on how "progress" brings with it unintended consequences. Well done!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the kind words! It's so intriguing to see how our
DeleteDNA, both physical and intellectual, seems studded with paradoxes and ambiguities. Such is, I suppose, the nature of humanity.